Home Updated on March 28, 2005  
Related Links

L-1 visa legislation

Introduction

The United States Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) governs who can legally enter the country, how long they can stay, and under what legal restrictions they can live and work.  The INA currently has 70 nonimmigrant visa categories that people can use to enter the United States for other than permanent immigration.  Of these 70 different categories, the H visa category is the largest, and the H-1B visa is the largest H sub-category. 

 

H1-B Background

The H-1B visa, in its current form, was established by Section 205 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-649) and updated by Title IV of P.L. 105-277 (the FY1999 Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act).  These laws established several major criteria for the H-1B program.  They defined H-1B visa holders as aliens who have “specialty occupations” and who hold at least a bachelor’s degree. 

 

The laws stipulated that the employer of an H-1B employee must pay the worker the prevailing (market) wage for that job.  Additionally, the employer must make efforts to hire domestic employees before applying for an H-1B visa.  Lastly, the laws established a fee that goes towards providing scholarships and grants to train workers domestically in the technical skills that cannot be currently found.  The H-1B visa allows the visa holder to work in the country for three years, with the ability to be renewed for a second three-year period.

 

H-1B Ceiling

The booming high-technology industry of the late-1990s caused a severe shortage of computer related workers.  To address fears of worker shortages, Congress passed legislation in 1998 to dramatically raise the number of H-1B visas from 65,000 (set by the INA in 1990) to 115,000 for 1999-2000 and 195,000 for 2001-2003.  At the end of FY2003 (September 31, 2003), the caps reverted to the 65,000 ceiling set by the INA.  In 1997, the annual visa ceiling (65,000) was reached by May.  In 2000, the ceiling (115,000) was reached by June.  With the recent stagnation of the high-tech sector, H-1B requests are expected to be lower this year; however, they are still expected to exceed the ceiling unless Congress acts to raise it.  There are currently no plans to raise the ceiling, however, debate is expected as the number of visas given approaches the cap. 

 

Snapshot of H-1B Holders

By law, holders of H-1B visas must have a bachelor’s degree (or the equivalent) and be proficient in a technical specialty that is not easily supplied by the domestic workforce.  In 2001, the last year for which statistics are available, 58.1% of all H-1B holders had a bachelor’s degree, with 29.6% holding master’s degrees and 7.5% holding their doctorates.  The remaining H-1B holders have professional/vocational degrees, or fall into a loophole created for “fashion models”. 

 

Also by law, companies are required to pay H-1B visa holders the prevailing wage for the industry.  As such, the average income in 2001 (last year for which data is available) for people newly arriving on an H-1B visa is $51,860.  This figure goes up to $65,000 for H-1B workers who have applied for and been granted the three year extension. 

 

Hi-tech workers comprised the vast number of H-1B visa holders in 2001 (again, the last year data is available), comprising 55.3% of all new incoming visa holders.  “Architects, engineers and surveyors” are a distant second, comprising 12.7% of arriving H-1B holders.  Administrative (7.8%), Teachers (5.9%) and Health Professionals (5.4%) are the other major categories using the H-1B visa to enter the United States.

 

India is by far the largest user of H-1B visas, taking 45.2% of the total in 2001.  For comparison, the next largest users are China at 8.4%, Canada at 4.6% and the Philippines at 3.6%.  Pakistan took 1.9% of all H-1B visas in 2001.

 

Legislation

There are three pieces of legislation currently pending in Congress that aim to either modify the program or eliminate it entirely.  The first is the “USA Jobs Protection Act of 2003” (S. 1452/H.R. 2849).  In current law, if a company has more than 15% of its employees on H-1B visas, it must certify that it has not laid off any domestic employees for 90 days before or after the hiring of an H-1B visa worker.  The bill would expand this provision to all companies who hire H-1B workers and expand the time period to 90 days before and 180 days after the hiring of an H-1B worker. 

 

S. 1452 was introduced by Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT).  The bill has no other cosponsors, and was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it has not had a hearing.  H.R. 2849 was introduced by Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (R-CT).  Her bill has 21 cosponsors, and was referred to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.  It has not had a committee hearing. 

 

The other pieces of legislation currently pending in the US Congress regarding H-1B visas are both in the House of Representatives.  H.R. 2235 would suspend the issuing of new nonimmigrant visas (including H-1B) until the Department of Homeland Security is able to fully screen all incoming immigrants and nonimmigrant visa holders.  This bill has 2 cosponsors, and was referred to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.  It has not had a committee hearing. 

 

H.R. 2688 was introduced by Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO) on July 9, 2003, and would end the H-1B program entirely.  This bill has no cosponsors, and was referred to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.  It has not had a committee hearing.  

 

Additionally, on July 24, 2003, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 2738 and H.R. 2739, the Chile and Singapore Free Trade Agreements (FTA).  The Senate passed its version of the bills (S.1416 and S. 1417) on July 31, 2003.  Within these bills was a provision to reserve a certain number of H-1B visas specifically for workers entering from Chile (1,400) and Singapore (5,400).  This inclusion of H-1B visas in the FTAs was controversial because it took away the power of Congress to set immigration law and placed it in the hands of trade negotiators (Congress was forced to vote on the negotiated treaties without opportunities to modify them).  However, the trade treaties passed and were signed into law on September 3, 2003 – including the H-1B provisions.





Copyright © 2001-2004, Indian American Center for Political Awareness. All rights reserved.

India Abroad Center for Political Awareness Home Page Sitemap 1 5 6